Showing posts with label bison uk. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bison uk. Show all posts

Friday, September 10, 2010

UK Border Agency to increase fees for immigration and nationality cases

The UK Border Agency has announced plans to increase immigration and nationality application fees for all those applying to visit, study, work or stay in the UK from autumn 2010.

In line with, the agency blamed the fee increases on ‘budgetary pressures’ and government cuts in public spending, and said the ‘proposals for in-year fees increase will help to offset some of these pressures alongside efficiency savings’.

The implementation date of the fees hike will be published shortly.

Examples of the fee increases include:
  • Settlement visas from £644 to £750 (apparently they "offer an extremely generous package of benefits to applicants", which sounds like Time Share speak to me)
  • Tier 1 visa from £690 to 750
  • Tier 1 in-country from £840 to £850
  • Tier 2 visa from £270 to £350
  • Tier 2 in-country from £475 to £500
  • Tier 4 visa from £199 to £220
  • Tier 4 in-country held at £357
  • Tier 5 from £128 to £130
  • Short term visit visas from £68 to £70
  • 2, 5 and 10 year visit visas to £245, £450 and £650 respectively
  • Increase in dependent fees to 20-30% of the principal applicant fee
The agency said that the ‘proposals to increase fees continue to strike the right balance between maintaining secure and effective border controls and ensuring that our fees structure does not inhibit the UK's ability to attract migrants and visitors who make a valued contribution’.

Immigration adviser Evelie Padadac was surprised by the mid-year increase saying:

“They normally increase fees once a year in April and this is the first time I have seen a second increase in the same year.

“However, the increases are quite small, as little as two pounds in some cases, and the in country Tier 4 student visa will remain at £357.”

See also:

Minister to announce crackdown on student visa numbers today

Smarter immigration controls needed says Minister Damian Green

Government adviser says dependant visas must be cut as part of immigration cap

If you need any immigration advice or help with Sponsorship or Work Permits, Visa, ILR/Settlement, Citizenship or an appeal against a refusal please email:

info@immigrationmatters.co.uk or visit www.immigrationmatters.co.uk

Friday, July 09, 2010

Four jailed over sham marriage scam UKBA reports

The UK Border Agency reports that four people have been jailed for a total of more than six years for their part in a sham marriage scam involving Nigerian and Dutch nationals.

The investigation was triggered when our officers identified the suspicious travel patterns of passengers flying in and out of Luton and Stansted Airports on tickets purchased by Adeolu Eletu, a 29-year-old Nigerian.

On 10 February, our officers from the immigration crime team (East), arrested Daniloush Solano, a 21-year-old Dutch woman, at Luton Airport as she attempted to board a flight to Amsterdam.

Investigations revealed that earlier that day Solano had married Eletu at a church in Wood Green, London. She was paid 1,500 euros for her role.

Eletu was subsequently arrested on 27 February at his home address in Falcon Brae, Livingston. His Nigerian girlfriend Helen Omoboye, 33, was also arrested. She had been due to participate in a sham marriage of her own at the same Wood Green venue on 11 February.

Sylvernus Ogungbade, a 36-year-old Nigerian, was also arrested on 10 February after officers established that Solano had caught her taxi to Luton Airport from his home in Goldbeater's Grove, Edgware. Immigration checks revealed that Ogungbade, who was living alone, had recently applied for a visa on the back of his marriage to a Dutch woman who is still wanted by us.

Last week at Luton Crown Court, Eletu, Ogungbade and Omoboye pleaded guilty to conspiring to breach the UK's immigration laws. Eletu and Omoboye also pleaded guilty to perjury charges.

Eletu was sentenced to two years eight months, Omoboye was sentenced to 18 months and Ogungbade was sentenced to a year and eight months. Solano had pleaded guilty to charges of conspiring to breach the UK's immigration laws and perjury at an earlier hearing on June 10. She was sentenced to 12 months.

Sam Bullimore, assistant director, UK Border Agency said:

'The sentences handed out show how seriously we, and the courts, take these kinds of attempts to undermine our immigration laws.

'We will not tolerate immigration abuse and, as these convictions demonstrate, our immigration crime teams are creating a hostile environment for those who break the immigration laws. We know that sham marriage rackets are not just about getting a ticket to the UK, often the offenders are also involved in other forms of criminality. If we see marriages that are not genuine, we will challenge them and prosecute where appropriate.

'People should be under no illusion that marriage is not enough to get permission to stay in the UK. Couples must also prove to the UK Border Agency that they have been in a genuine relationship for at least two years.'

Any foreign criminal sentenced to more than 12 months in prison for any offence is automatically considered for deportation. Source: UK Border Agency

See also:

Border Agency bust sham marriage – six arrested

UK Border Agency foils sham marriage

The great American immigration deception

American town bans renting property to illegal immigrants

US Green cards face fee hikes

Complete USA Immigration and Naturalization Package

For more information on US Naturalization and immigration Click Here!

If you need any immigration advice or help with Sponsorship or Work Permits, Visa or an appeal against a refusal please email:

info@immigrationmatters.co.uk or visit www.immigrationmatters.co.uk

Monday, July 05, 2010

Failed asylum seeker wants to stay so he can win the ‘X Factor’

An asylum seeker is begging immigration officials not to throw him out of Britain - so he can win X Factor, the Sun reports.

Desperate Ahmed Ali al-Hamed has had his application to stay here rejected and ought to be on his way back to the Middle East.

But he auditioned in front of producers for the hit talent show earlier this year and is now claiming he can follow in the footsteps of last year's teenage winner Joe McElderry.

He is also insisting that Simon Cowell is tipping him for the top, that he has explained his immigration status to the music mogul and that he can impress Cheryl Cole and the other judges.

An X Factor spokesman confirmed al-Hamed, 21, had sung for "other executives" but denied he had met Simon.

Al-Hamed, who has been here for six years, is hoping to delay the asylum boot until at least the next run of filmed auditions, which hit Manchester next month.

A source said: "This must be a first - an asylum seeker using a reality TV show as the basis for his case.

"He has exhausted all the normal channels and now appears to be clinging to this."

Al-Hamed, who is from the United Arab Emirates, is understood to have tried several different arguments already to avoid being kicked out.

Initially he said he wanted to stay because he is gay, and then that his mother writes politically controversial articles in their own country.

He arrived here in 2004 and later spent a year studying at Bath University.

He is currently understood to be living in Liverpool. Source: The Sun

If you need any immigration advice or help with Sponsorship or Work Permits, Visa or an appeal against a refusal please email:

info@immigrationmatters.co.uk or visit www.immigrationmatters.co.uk

Saturday, July 03, 2010

Theresa May's statement to the House of Commons on immigration limit

Earlier this week the Home Secretary Theresa May announced that the number of workers entering the UK from outside Europe will be controlled by a new limit.

Theresa May told the House of Commons that the government would ‘scale back net migration to the levels of the 1990s - with the effect that it will be in the tens of thousands rather than hundreds of thousands. Imposing a cap on non EU migrants from coming here to work is just one of the ways the government intends to achieve this.

Details of how the final limit will be delivered will be agreed following a 12-week government consultation with businesses. In the meantime, an interim limit will be introduced to ensure that there is no 'closing down sale' and the number of work visas issued stays below 2009 levels.

The results of the consultation on the permanent limit will pave the way for the government's fundamental changes on the way in which workers from outside the European Union (EU) will be chosen to come and work in the UK.

The Home Secretary has also asked the Migration Advisory Committee, the government's independent adviser on migration issues, to launch a separate consultation into what level the limit should be set at, taking into account social and economic impacts.

Home Secretary Theresa May said:

'This government believes that Britain can benefit from migration but not uncontrolled migration. I recognise the importance of attracting the brightest and the best to ensure strong economic growth, but unlimited migration places unacceptable pressure on public services.

'While we consult on our tough new limit it's important we have an interim measure to avoid a "closing down sale" for migrants and ensure that the number of work visas issued stays below 2009 levels.

'The government will also introduce measures to support British people. Alongside limits will be action to get Britain back to work and provide business with the skills they need from the resident workforce - reducing the need for migrants at the same time as we reduce their number.'

These interim measures include:
  • a cap on the number of Tier 1 migrants at current levels and raising the number of points needed by non-EU workers who come to do highly skilled jobs from 95 to 100; and
  • a limit on the number of certificates of sponsorship that licensed employers can issue to those who wish to come to fill skilled job vacancies. This will reduce the number of people entering through Tier 2 by 1,300.
The Home Secretary added:

'The government promised large-scale change to Britain's immigration system - and that is what we are delivering. Alongside the limit on non EU migrant workers, we have already introduced a requirement that those coming here to marry learn English, and our urgent review into child detention for immigration purposes is under way.'

Click here to find out about the consultation and how to take part in the consultation.

This UK Border Agency website contains more information about the Tier 1 interim limit and the Tier 2 interim limit.

Home Secretary's statement to the House of Commons

The Home Secretary made the following oral statement to the House of Commons today:

'Immigration has enriched our culture and enhanced our society. Britain can benefit from immigration, but not uncontrolled immigration. The levels of net migration seen under the previous government - an annual figure of almost a quarter of a million at its peak in 2004 - were unprecedented in recent times. It is this government's aim to reduce the level of net migration back down to the levels of the 1990s - tens of thousands each year, not hundreds of thousands.

'Of course, it is necessary to attract the world's very best talent to come to the UK to drive strong economic growth, but unlimited migration has placed unacceptable pressure on public services and, worse, severely damaged public confidence in our immigration system. Our over-reliance on migrant labour has done nothing to help the millions of unemployed and low-skilled British citizens who deserve the government's help to get back to work and improve their skills. The coalition's programme for government confirmed the government's intention to introduce an annual limit on the number of non-EU economic migrants admitted into the UK to live and work. We have always said that we will consult on the implementation of that limit. It is important that the government take full account of the views of business and other interested sectors. We want to ensure that we can properly weigh the economic considerations against the wider social and public service implications.

'I am therefore launching a consultation today on the mechanisms for implementing that annual limit, including questions about the coverage of limits, as well as the mechanics of how they will work in practice. The consultation also recognises the need to attract more high net-worth individuals to the UK through the routes for investors and entrepreneurs, which will not be covered by limits, and we ask for views on how that can be achieved. At the same time, I have commissioned the independent Migration Advisory Committee to provide advice to the government on the levels at which limits should be set for the first full year of their operation, which I intend should be from April 2011.

'I am sure that all Members of the House would agree with me that the Migration Advisory Committee has an excellent track record in this area, and I want to take this opportunity to record my thanks to David Metcalf and the rest of the committee for taking on this critical piece of work. The consultations will be complete by the end of September, and I intend to make final announcements about the first full annual limit before the end of the calendar year.

'It is important that today's announcement does not lead to a surge of applications during this interim period, which would lead to an increase in net migration, undermining the purpose of the limit and putting undue strain on the UK Border Agency. I am therefore also taking a number of interim measures, and I have laid a statement of changes to the Immigration Rules in support of those measures. First, I am introducing an interim limit on the number of out-of-country main applicants to Tier 1 (General). For 2010-11, this route will be held flat from the equivalent period for 2009-10. The Tier 1 routes for investors, entrepreneurs and the post-study route are not affected. Secondly, to ensure that those who do come through this route are the brightest and best, I am raising the Tier 1 (General) pass mark by five points for all new applicants.

'Thirdly, I am introducing an interim limit on the number of migrants who can be offered jobs by sponsor employers through Tier 2 (General). This route will be reduced in the interim period by 1,300 migrants, the equivalent of a 5 per cent reduction across the relevant routes of Tiers 1 and 2. The Tier 2 routes for intra-company transfers, ministers of religion and - I am not sure whether to say this, given the comments at the end of the Prime Minister's statement - elite sportspeople are not affected. These interim measures will take effect from 19 July.

'It is vital that we restore public confidence in our immigration system. Our plans to do that extend much further than the measures I am announcing today. We support e-Borders and the re-introduction of exit checks. We have said that we will create a dedicated border police force to enhance national security, improve immigration controls and crack down on the trafficking of people, weapons and drugs. We have committed to improving our asylum system to speed up the processing of applications. We have said that we will end the detention of children for immigration purposes, and the UK Border Agency has already launched a review engaging a wide range of experts and organisations on how to achieve this.

'Our commitment to reduce net migration will require action, as I am sure the right hon. Member for Kingston upon Hull West and Hessle (Alan Johnson) will indicate in a moment, beyond the economic routes. It may assist him if I tell the House now that I will be reviewing other immigration routes in due course and will be bringing forward further proposals for consideration by the House. And, of course, unlike the previous government, we are committed to applying transitional controls for all new EU member states.

'The commitment to introduce limits on non-EU economic migration is a major immigration commitment of the coalition government. Today's announcement is a key step towards the delivery of that commitment, and I commend this statement to the House.' Source: Uk Border Agency

See also:

Government limit for Tier 2 (General) of the points-based system

UK Border Agency issue clarification on changes to Tier 1 points

UKBA challenge Appeal Court Tier 1 ruling on AP (Russia) and others

UK immigration cap Q&A – your questions answered

Immediate cap on non-EU migrant workers to be introduced by Home Office

Immigration cap ‘would damage hospitality sector’ say REC

Home Office confirm UK migration limit

If you need any immigration advice or help with Sponsorship or Work Permits, Visa or an appeal against a refusal please email:

info@immigrationmatters.co.uk or visit www.immigrationmatters.co.uk

Canada immigration growing

Canada is in a unique position within the main countries to which people choose to emigrate, as they possess the world's most positive attitude to immigration.

It would be fair to say that this approach is not mirrored anywhere else in the world. 'Immigration Canada' is constantly updating policy to accommodate new issues and new problems that arise due to migrating workers.

These policy changes or introductions include:
  • initiatives to build new housing developments specifically for migrant workers
  • rule changes to best address the countries need for skilled workers
  • free language courses for those that do not possess English as their first language
As such Canada's drive for migrant workers has seen the economy grow inline with the numbers that they allow to settle in the country. Some cities in Canada are made up of over half foreign-born nationals.

Canada currently has a quota of 265,000 immigrants a year, which is unlikely to be lowered in the next 10 years.

This means that the Canada of today is vastly different to 20-years ago, and one could even go as far as to say it is vastly different to countries around the world.

No other country has such a fair and even policy or attitude. Reports about cities such as Toronto and Quebec constantly cite the multi-cultural feel of the areas as one of the over-riding factors people come away with. This is the result of those migrating to Canada and making it their home.

The largest ethnic groups resettling in Canada are the Chinese and Indian communities. These groups are culturally very hard-working and see the lifestyle and options Canada offers as immensely enriching.

Canada also offers a number of world beating public services that you would be hard-pressed to match anywhere else:
  • Free public healthcare
  • Free education
  • Excellent transport links
These services re-enforce the belief that Canada is among the world's top 5 countries to live, while supporting the main pull factor of a blossoming and productive job market.

Most people emigrating to Canada rarely regret their decision, as they regard it as the best choice they ever made. It sometimes seems like the 'world wants to be Canadian'!

More interesting is the fact the people that talking to those who live live there you will be hard-pressed to find a Canadian that has moved away from the country permanently.

Canada offers a wealth of benefits and continues to attract those wishing to forge a new life abroad. Source: James P Lewis http://EzineArticles.com

In the UK, where the he new coalition government has pledged to cut immigration and impose a cap on non-EU immigration, thousands of people are seeking greener opportunities in countries like Canada, USA and Australia.

See also:

Why the world wants to be Canadian

For more information on how you can migrate to Canada - CLICK HERE

If you need any immigration advice or help with Sponsorship or Work Permits, Visa or an appeal against a refusal please email:

info@immigrationmatters.co.uk or visit www.immigrationmatters.co.uk

Wednesday, June 30, 2010

Philippine Government launch new program for OFW's

The Department of Labor and Employment (DoLE) recently launched a program that ensures the efficient delivery of the social protection services to overseas Filipino workers (OFWs).

Dubbed ‘Kabayanihan,’ the program will be implemented in partnership with the Social Security System
(SSS), Philhealth, Pag-ibig, Philippine Overseas Employment Administration (POEA) and the Overseas Workers Welfare Administration (OWWA).

Labor Secretary Marianito Roque said ‘Kabayanihan,’ a one-stop-shop that will be set up at the Philippines Overseas Labor Offices (POLO), uses a ‘bundling approach’ membership and services.

“This means that all government welfare services, social insurance, savings and investment, housing, loans and scholarship benefits to OFWs and their families, among others are unified to make it more accessible, convenient and affordable for the OFWs,’’ said Roque.

“Registration and transaction procedures are also expected to be simplified under the program,’’ said Roque. Source: Shianee Mamanglu, Manila Bulletin

See also:

Filipino domestic workers struggle for justice and survival

Overseas Filipino workers boost Philippine balance of payments

US Green cards face fee hikes

Complete USA Immigration and Naturalization Package

For more information on US Naturalization and immigration Click Here!

Ultimate Guide to Job Interview Answers

“How To Answer Any Question An Interviewer Could Possibly Throw At You! … “ Click Here!

If you need any immigration advice or help with Sponsorship or Work Permits, Visa or an appeal against a refusal please email:

info@immigrationmatters.co.uk or visit www.immigrationmatters.co.uk

International students are turning to universities as UK government clamp down on private colleges

Cynthia Barker writes that UK based non-EU students are increasingly looking to Universities as a place to continue their studies after having their fingers burned by private colleges.

Although University fees are higher than in the private sector, students are more secure from the kind of immigration rule changes which the UK Border Agency (UKBA) has inflicted on non-government colleges in the last few months.

As an immigration adviser I have met students who have been through up to three private colleges only to see each one been closed down or had their Tier 4 licence revoked just months after been put on the register by the UKBA.

With this in mind some are no longer prepared to risk losing thousands of pounds on a college which, however reputable, can be put out of business at the stroke of a pen.

So what are the pro’s and con’s of a University compared to a private provider?

The first obvious advantage of using a government funded provider is security. Any rule changes are likely to favour the state sector, which had previously been losing out to more competitive private colleges, and Universities will not lose their Tier 4 licence - however badly they monitor their students!

The other crucial advantage is that most University courses lead to a recognised Bachelors or Masters degree, which means you can automatically qualify to stay in the UK under the ‘Post-study work’ scheme for two years under Tier 1 of the points based system. Some private colleges also offer degree level courses validated by Universities.

British Universities are renowned all over the world for their excellence and high standards and a UK degree carries a lot of weight on any CV.

On the other hand fees for courses will be much higher than a private college, a typical degree course will cost around £8900 per annum, and term times are not so flexible.

However, Evelie Padadac an OISC registered immigration adviser with Bison Management UK, said students with a Philippine degree can benefit from their APL (Accredited Prior Learning) and gain a degree in a shorter time or go straight to a one year post graduate Masters programme.

For instance, a student with a nursing degree and some experience back home could gain a UK BSc in Nursing degree, which would enable them to practice as a registered nurse, by only completing the final year of the course.

There are a multitude of subjects from Foundation degrees to MBA’s available to study with the most popular courses for overseas students being business and management.

Colleges fight back

The UK Border Agency are facing a raft of Judicial Reviews against Tier 4 suspension decisions from international colleges.

In March English UK, which represents English language schools, launched a legal challenge against the Home Office over fears that the UK will lose thousands of jobs and £400m in income through tighter visa regulations.

Earlier this month a cross party group of 14 MP’s signed an Early Day Motion (EDM) calling on the UK Government to abolish ‘flawed and rushed’ legislation brought in by the previous administration requiring overseas students wishing to study English in Britain to first pass an English test. An appeal against the Home Office interpretation of the Points Based System has succeeded in the Court of Appeal. The case is Secretary of State for the Home Department v Pankina [2010] EWCA Civ 719. The question now is where this leaves the Home Office on the many Judicial Review cases it is defending against international colleges and English UK.

Overseas students worth £8 billion to UK economy

Financial pressures have made overseas students an increasingly important source of income for universities and the wider economy.

In the UK, overseas students are worth £5.3bn each year, according to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, and £8 billion according to former immigration minister Phil Woolas.

There are plenty of countries waiting in the wings to woo international students such as Australia where students have a route to residency.

See also:

Colleges challenge UK Govenrment’s Tier 4 suspension in Judicial Review

Early Day Motion calls on UK Government to scrap new Tier 4 student visa rules

English language schools to challenge tightening of visa rules by judicial review

Points Based System appeal case succeeds

For free immigration news updates, please visit www.immigrationmatters.co.uk

Migrant cap will 'hit growth' business tells UK Government

The Government-imposed limit on immigration could pose a risk to the UK recovery, a prominent business group has told Sky News.

David Frost, director general of the British Chambers of Commerce, told Jeff Randall Live that it was not a good time to close the door on workers who could play a role in rebuilding Britain's fragile economy.

His warning followed an announcement by Home Secretary Theresa May of a temporary cap on the number of migrant workers allowed into the UK from outside the EU.

Mr Frost told Sky business presenter Anna Jones: "We need to be careful that at a time when we need to get all the growth we can in the UK economy that we remember the needs of British business.

"The City for example... relies on a pool of global talent; specialist engineering companies working in the North Sea, those vital new science and innovation companies (all) rely on getting their employees from across the globe. We can't stop that."

On a day which saw the Government signal cuts to benefits as it seeks to reduce the budget deficit, Mr Frost also called for changes to the welfare system.

"We need to look at the whole picture and of course what is happening is, because many of the local employees don't have the skills, don't have the work ethic, then of course businesses are turning to Eastern European migrants and you can't reform migration without reforming the benefits system.

"Too many companies report through to me that they offer the job to the local person but they say 'It's not worth it - I get more money on benefit' and therefore immigration has got to be tackled hand and hand with welfare reform."

Mr Frost's views on the potential economic impact of an immigration cap echoed a warning from shadow home secretary Alan Johnson.

Mr Johnson told Sky News companies could take their business elsewhere if they were banned from hiring the skilled workers they need.

"The people we're talking about here are the people the economy needs in order to grow in very difficult economic times... At best this is a gesture, at worst this is a deceit," he said.

The restrictions mean that just over 24,000 workers from outside Europe can enter the country this year - 5% fewer than last year.

The measures are intended to prevent a spike in workers heading to the UK before the introduction of a permanent limit next year.

Defending the move, Mrs May told Sky News: "We need to introduce this limit. Immigration has been good for the UK but uncontrolled immigration isn't."

The Liberal Democrats, who are part of the coalition government, opposed the Conservatives' policy during the election campaign. Source: Sky News

This month a cross party group of MP’s signed an Early Day Motion (EDM) calling on the UK Government to abolish ‘flawed and rushed’ legislation brought in by the previous administration requiring overseas students wishing to study English in Britain to first pass an English test.

The new coalition Government has slashed a £75m programme to help 50,000 young unemployed people enter the adult social care workforce, in a move condemned by a leading care provider.

The Highly Skilled Migrants Forum and the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants (JCWI) argued that the cap would be unworkable and could damage the economy. The forum warned that a curb on international students would put at risk the £12bn a year generated by their fees.

The Home Office should take care that we do not scare off talented migrants and fee paying students who bring in over £12 billion in fees to Universities and colleges. Australia and Canada are waiting in the wings ready to grab skilled migrants take our share of the lucrative student market.

See also:

Home Office confirm UK migration limit

Early Day Motion calls on UK Government to scrap new Tier 4 student visa rules

UK Government scraps social care recruitment incentives

Lib Dem defends temporary cap on non-EU migration

Immediate cap on non-EU migrant workers to be introduced by Home Office

Immigration cap ‘would damage hospitality sector’ say REC

Cameron’s immigration cap ‘will strangle Britain’ say JCWI

Nursing In Australia-A Guide To Working & Living As A Nurse Down Under

Why the world wants to be Canadian

For more information on how you can migrate to Canada - CLICK HERE

If you need any immigration advice or help with Sponsorship or Work Permits, Visa or an appeal against a refusal please email:

info@immigrationmatters.co.uk or visit www.immigrationmatters.co.uk

Tuesday, June 29, 2010

UK immigration cap - Q&A

The fantastic BBC website team have produced this useful Q&A on the new immigration cap

How does the British immigration system currently work?

There are different ways to come to live or settle permanently in the UK.

Putting it very simply, migrants fall into five categories: economic migrants, students, temporary workers or visitors, refugees and asylum seekers, or people arriving for family reasons such as marriage.

Family reunion is the easiest part of the system to understand. If you are the partner of a British citizen or someone living permanently in the UK, you can ask to join them. The principles behind the refugee system are relatively simple too. If you believe you need protection because you are being persecuted, you apply for asylum. Government's main focus at the moment is the complicated business of economic migration.

So how does economic migration work?

The British system differentiates between most people who live in Europe and migrants from the rest of the world. If a migrant is a citizen of one of the European Union's member states (or one of the other counties in the European Economic Area), then they are free to compete for jobs in the UK.

This is because the UK is part of the European free trade area under which goods, services and labour can be freely traded across borders. The rules mean that British workers can equally seek work and settle across the rest of the EU.

And what about if you come from elsewhere?

If you come from anywhere else, including Commonwealth nations, a migrant has to apply under one of the "tiers" that make up the Points Based System (PBS).

This is a popular system among leading industrialised nations which allows border agencies to let in people the economy genuinely needs by awarding them points for their skills. Those with the most skills get the most points - and find it easier to get in.

So what are the tiers?

The most prized migrants in the global economy are, logically, the highly skilled. This would include business leaders with top qualifications and experience, doctors, experts in their professional fields and so on.

MIGRATION TO UK 2008

TOTAL: 590,000

UK citizens: 85,000

EU nationals: 198,000

Rest of the world: 307,000

Net inflow: 163,000

Source: ONS Long-term migration statistics (opens ONS page)

Under the Labour government, many of these "Tier 1" migrants could apply to enter the UK without a guaranteed job because experts say they are likely to generate wealth and expand the economy.

Tier 2 of the system covers skilled workers who must be sponsored. An employee advertises a post for a month - and if they believe they can't fill it from the British labour force, they can ask the Home Office for permission to bring in a foreign worker to fill the gap.

Tier 3 covers low skilled workers from outside the EEA - but that part of the system has never been introduced because the government says the vacancies should be filled by UK and European workers.

The fourth tier of the system covers students. The final tier covers temporary workers or visitors - such as young people working in bars or agriculture as they fund gap year travels. It also covers some very specific categories outside of the main economy, such as elite sportsmen and women, performing artists and religious leaders.

Will this system be scrapped?

No. But the new coalition government has pledged to tighten it up because it's the most obvious lever it has to push down levels of migration. It will introduce a cap on migration from April 2011. In the meantime, it is introducing temporary caps on some parts of Tier 1 and Tier 2 workers.

The number of general Tier 1 highly skilled migrants will be capped at the current level of about 5,400 applicants and the points required for entry will also be raised.

Investors and entrepreneurs putting cash into the British economy will not be blocked. The government is also cutting by 1,300 the number of skilled workers who gain entry through Tier 2 - but it won't block companies from moving their own staff in and out of the country, a relatively significant part of economic migration of skilled workers.

What does a cut of 1,300 workers look like in the context of all migration?

The Office for National Statistics says that 505,000 non-British people came to live in the UK for more than a year in 2008.

In the first three months of 2010, the UK Border Agency issued 6,685 Tier 1 visas and 16,915 Tier 2 visas as part of the 406,455 approvals it made to all visitors and economic migrants.

Other figures show some 214,345 were allowed to settle permanently in the UK in the year to March 2010. Just under half of these settlements were granted to people who had come for work and put down roots. The 1,300 temporary cut in skilled worker visas equals about 1.5% of these work-related settlements.

What will the cap be set at?

The government is asking business for its views on what the cap should be and how it should work. Once a cap is in place, it proposes putting all the skilled migrants into a first-come-first-served system - meaning that companies will need to act fast to get the people they want.

For the highly skilled migrants, it suggests placing them all in a pool. Employers could then periodically dip into that pool to fish out the top worker they want.

What effect will a cap have?

The short answer is that we don't know. If the cap were set very high it would have no effect at all. The key question that nobody can answer is how employers will react if it's set very tightly.

Let's take one example - the ongoing demand for home and social care workers. The government has been telling the care industry to do more to train up British workers so that it becomes less reliant on foreign care workers labour from around the world.

But, if a cap is put in place, will employers invest in training British workers - which some warn will lead to higher prices for the services - or will they bring in more workers from cheaper parts of the European Union?

And if they bring in more EU workers, something ministers cannot stop, will the government be able to meet a pledge to reduce levels of net migration back to "tens of thousands, not hundreds of thousands"?

Ministers say they're not promising the Earth - but they pledging better control and certainty. They refer to the experience of New Zealand which operates a points and limits system very efficiently. Its labour market is smaller than the population of London - and it's also not part of a trading block comparable to the EU, which accounts for a third of all migration into the UK.

But long-term EU migration patterns are difficult to predict. Many EU economies applied temporary bars on workers from central and Eastern Europe. That bar will be lifted. Home Secretary Theresa May says she will be "very surprised" if that doesn't lead to changes in where workers from countries like Poland head. Source BBC.co.uk

See also:

Home Office confirm UK migration limit

If you need any immigration advice or help with Sponsorship or Work Permits, Visa or an appeal against a refusal please email:

info@immigrationmatters.co.uk or visit www.immigrationmatters.co.uk

Immigration will be reduced says Immigration Minister

Damian Green announced last week that the new government will introduce measures to ‘properly control immigration’ following figures released on 24 June which shows an increase in the UK population.

Responding to statistics which showed the population increased in 2008-09, the minister for immigration said the new government intends to reduce immigration numbers back to 1990s levels.

Figures released by the Office for National Statistics (new window) showed that the population of the UK was 61.8m in mid-2009, an increase of 394,000 on the previous year.

The report showed a total population increase of 2.7m compared with 2001.

'Far too high'

The new Minister for Immigration, who replaced Phil Woolas following the general election, said:

‘We believe that immigration has been far too high in recent years, which is why the new government will reduce net migration back down to the levels of the 1990s — to tens of thousands rather than hundreds of thousands.

‘Over the coming weeks and months the public will see us tackle this issue by introducing a wide range of new measures to ensure that immigration is properly controlled, including a limit on work permits, actions on marriage and an effective system of regulating the students who come here.’ Source: Home Office

There were several media reports last weekend that the coalition government had watered down its flagship ‘immigration cap’ election pledge after a cabinet revolt.

The BBC reports that the Business Secretary Vince Cable defended government plans for a temporary cap on migrant workers from outside the EU, but said it must be implemented in a “flexible way”.

The government has informed the media that it will announce a limit of 24,100 until April 2011 while the coalition consults on introducing a permanent cap.

Whilst Britain has been introducing measures to reduce immigration for the last few years, Canada is attracting the best migrants from both the developing world and the UK. See Why the world wants to be Canadian.

Related immigration articles:

Lib Dem defends temporary cap on non-EU migration

Immediate cap on non-EU migrant workers to be introduced by Home Office

Demographic shift ‘will cut UK growth’ according to ONS figures

Immigration cap ‘would damage hospitality sector’ say REC

If you need any immigration advice or help with Sponsorship or Work Permits, Visa or an appeal against a refusal please email:

info@immigrationmatters.co.uk or visit www.immigrationmatters.co.uk

Commons Speaker to investigate leak claim

Immigration Matters reports.

Commons Speaker John Bercow has promised to investigate claims that a statement on immigration was leaked to the media before MPs were informed, the BBC reports.

Labour MP Chris Bryant accused ministers of "consistently leaking to the press".

He added that, in telling the media before MPs about its plans, the government could "laugh at this House".

Mr Bercow promised an inquiry to "decide what action needs to be taken".

In a statement to the Commons, Home Secretary Theresa May announced a consultation on introducing an annual cap on non-EU immigration and said that, as a first step, the number of skilled workers allowed into the UK from outside the EU is to be cut by 1,300 between now and April 2011.

'New pattern'

This was widely reported in the media beforehand.

Making a point of order, Mr Bryant said to the Speaker: "You said last week and you said five weeks ago that you wholly deprecated the practice of ministers announcing things to the press before announce them to this House."

He added: "There's no point getting elected to this House if you might as well have stayed at home and listened to the statement on the radio or television or read it in the newspapers...

"We know we have a government which is consistently leaking to the press."

Mr Bryant said it was important to act because "otherwise, ministers will laugh at this house".

In response, Mr Bercow said he did not know the details of Mr Bryant's claims, but told MPs: "I reiterate in the strongest possible terms that I entirely deprecate the practice of releasing to the media the content of ministerial statements before those statements have been made to the House."

He added: "I can confirm to the honourable gentleman [Mr Bryant] that I'm willing to look further into the precise details of this case, to decide what, if any, action needs to be taken.

"We need to establish a new pattern in this parliament, whereby this sort of thing doesn't happen and, if it does, action is taken."

Mr Bercow said he would report back to MPs with the findings of the inquiry. Source BBC

See also:

Immediate cap on non-EU migrant workers to be introduced by Home Office

If you need any immigration advice or help with Sponsorship or Work Permits, Visa or an appeal against a refusal please email:

info@immigrationmatters.co.uk or visit www.immigrationmatters.co.uk

Monday, June 28, 2010

Lib Dem's Cable defends temporary cap on non-EU migration

There have been several media reports that the coalition government has watered down its flagship ‘immigration cap’ election pledge after a cabinet revolt.

The BBC reports that the Business Secretary Vince Cable defended government plans for a temporary cap on migrant workers from outside the EU, but said it must be implemented in a "flexible way".

The government has informed the media that it will announce a limit of 24,100 until April 2011 while the coalition consults on introducing a permanent cap.

Mr Cable said ministers had "signed up" to the principle of a cap, but they must "accommodate" the needs of certain industries as well as universities.

Labour has said an arbitrary immigration cap is "fraught with difficulty".

The Lib Dems opposed Conservative proposals for an annual cap before the election - but agreed to back the proposal as part of their coalition agreement.

'Public reassurance'

The temporary cap, due to be announced today by Home Secretary Theresa May, is aimed at preventing a rush of applications before a permanent figure is agreed.

Mr Cable told the BBC's Andrew Marr show that it was designed to "pre-empt a flood" of new arrivals in the period before permanent arrangements came into force.

Businesses have warned that the cap could stop them from filling vacancies at times of high demand and also recruiting people with specific skills in areas such as catering and social care.

Critics have said the measures could have a detrimental effect on the higher education sector, which is reliant for much of its income on foreign students.

"The new regime has to accommodate those concerns," Mr Cable said. "It has to be implemented in a flexible way."

The government had to "reassure the public" that there was an effective system of immigration controls in place but also to ensure the economy was not damaged as it seeks to recover from the effects of the recession.

'Confident'

He said talks between Conservative and Lib Dem ministers on the issue had been "collegiate".

"I am confident the way it is being implemented will achieve these objectives," he said.

During the election campaign David Cameron said he wanted to reduce net annual migration - the number of immigrants minus the number emigrating from the UK - from hundreds of thousands currently to tens of thousands.

Labour says any policy needs to be "tough but fair" and that the points-based system it introduced in 2008 has succeeded in reducing immigration levels and stopping unskilled workers from outside the EU coming into the UK.

The home secretary will give details of the consultation process ministers will undertake before deciding what the permanent cap should be.

It has been reported that this could include the option of exempting job categories to reflect skills shortages in some areas.

Mr Cable also defended the Budget, saying many of the spending cuts and tax rises announced by Chancellor George Osborne were "unpleasant" but action was needed to deal with the "horrendous" financial situation the coalition had inherited.

Measures such as raising the income tax threshold for the lowest-paid - as well maintaining the top rate 50p tax band and cutting pension tax relief for the better-off - helped offset the VAT increase in terms of where the burden fell, he added.

"If you look at the package as a whole, that makes the balance much better and more equitable," he said.

He also played down talk that Lib Dem MPs could seek to table amendments to the Budget following comments by the party's Deputy Leader Simon Hughes last week.

"We have a balanced package as it is," he added. "We are not reopening it." Source: BBC

During the election campaign the Liberal's were the only main party to suggest an amnesty as a way of dealing with the estimated 750,000 immigrants illegally in the UK. Although their honesty did not go down too well with voters they now find themselves, through the coalition government, in a position to influence immigration policy.

See also:

Immediate cap on non-EU migrant workers to be introduced by Home Office

Demographic shift ‘will cut UK growth’ according to ONS figures

Immigration cap ‘would damage hospitality sector’ say REC

If you need any immigration advice or help with Sponsorship or Work Permits, Visa or an appeal against a refusal please email:

info@immigrationmatters.co.uk or visit www.immigrationmatters.co.uk

Revised Green Card Form I-9 Documentation

On May 11, 2010, USCIS (U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services) announced it had redesigned the Permanent Resident Card, which most of us know more commonly as the Green Card. In a moment of sheer genius, the designers of the "Green" Card actually decided to make it green in color for ease of recognition!

A Green Card is proof of authorization to live and work in the United States. A newly issued Green Card is valid for 10 years for lawful permanent residents and 2 years for conditional residents.

Some existing Green Cards have an expiration date - these cards will remain valid until they expire. Holders of Green Cards with an expiration date will receive the redesigned version when seeking a renewal or replacement.

Other existing Green Cards have no expiration date. These cards remain valid however; USCIS is recommending that people who have a card without an expiration date apply to replace their cards with the newly redesigned version.

Evidence of Work Eligibility

The intent of the newly redesigned Permanent Resident Card is to help prevent immigration fraud. The new Green Card incorporates state-of-the-art technology to prevent counterfeiting and facilitate accurate authentication. The enhanced features are intended to be useful to law enforcement, employers, and immigrants - all of whom look to the Green Card as definitive proof of authorization to legally live and work in the United States.

Although this seems to be a positive step in decreasing incidents of identity theft and document fraud, it actually creates more uncertainty for employers. It becomes the employer's burden to identify legitimate documents when many employers are not familiar with every version of the Green Card issued over time.

There have been several versions of the Green Card issued over the years. The first Green Card was issued in 1946 and at that time was referred to as an Alien Registration Receipt Card. Few of these are still in circulation. They contain no expiration date and as of March 20, 1996 are no longer valid evidence of permanent residency. Other versions of the Resident Alien Card were issued in 1977 and again in 1989. Oddly enough, neither the 1977 card nor the 1989 were green in color.

In 1997, the card was renamed the Permanent Resident Card. It was updated yet again in 2004. Every time the card has been updated, additional security measures have been added. As for the most current version, holders of older cards will only receive the redesigned Permanent Resident Card when seeking a renewal or replacement card.

Recipients of the redesigned Permanent Resident Card will include those newly approved lawful permanent residents, as well as those who get a renewal or replacement card. As of May 11, 2010 the cost of renewing or replacing a Permanent Resident Card was $370.

Identity Documents for the Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification

Inspecting work authorization and identity documents is an integral part of meeting your responsibility to verify the work eligibility of each person you hire. Employers should choose to work with a qualified expert to help them navigate the complex requirements of the Form I-9.

See also:

American Immigration – what will be the impact of increased processing fees?

Canadian Government takes on rogue immigration consultants

American town bans renting property to illegal immigrants

US Green cards face fee hikes

Complete USA Immigration and Naturalization Package

For more information on US Naturalization and immigration Click Here!

Saturday, June 26, 2010

Home Office will bring in immediate cap on non-EU migrant workers

A temporary limit on the number of migrant workers from outside the EU allowed into the UK is to be introduced ahead of a planned permanent cap, the BBC reports.

New Home Secretary Theresa May will limit the number of workers to 24,100 - down around 5% - between now and April 2011.

The Conservatives' election pledge to curb immigration survived the coalition agreement with the Liberal Democrats.

Labour said that the introduction of an arbitrary immigration cap "is fraught with difficulty".

The temporary cap is aimed at preventing a rush of applications before a permanent cap is set next April.

Ms May will announce the move on Monday, as she launches a consultation process for deciding the level of the permanent cap.

Julia Onslow-Cole, of PricewaterhouseCoopers, told the BBC that every overseas national brought by firms into the UK cost them three times as much as hiring a resident worker.

"They are not spending this money for nothing, they really need that expertise.

"Particularly in these economic times, I think it's very important that we allow businesses a free choice to bring in overseas nationals," she said.

The Bangladesh Caterers' Association - which represents 12,000 Asian restaurants across the UK - says a cap on immigration will have a serious effect on their ability to recruit skilled chefs from outside the EU to work in the UK.

A spokeswoman for the sector said it contributed £30bn to the UK economy and the planned temporary limit would hinder economic recovery and growth.

The Recruitment and Employment Confederation (REC), which represents the UK's £27bn private recruitment industry, also said it was concerned the cap would lead to greater skills shortages and would affect the delivery of social care in some areas.

A spokesman for the Confederation of British Industry said the organisation would wait until an announcement by the home secretary on Monday before making any comment.

A spokesman for the Labour Party said they would wait until Monday to make a full response, but added: "It seems that senior Tories are also doubtful about the proposals.

"The tough Australian-style points system introduced by Labour has already had a big impact on bringing down migrant numbers and closed the door to unskilled workers from outside the EU.

"We remain committed to an approach that will help our economy and which is tough but fair."

During the election campaign David Cameron said he wanted to reduce net annual migration - the number of immigrants minus the number emigrating from the UK - from hundreds of thousands to tens of thousands. The figure currently stands at 163,000.

The Liberal Democrats opposed a cap during the election campaign in May but signed up to the Tory idea as part of the coalition deal.

However they won agreement to end the detention of children in immigration centres.

Alp Mehmet, of MigrationWatchUK, said the introduction of a temporary limit was "a welcome sign that the government is starting as it means to continue".

He said: "We need carefully to consider how net immigration will be brought down to tens of thousands - we believe about 40,000 is a realistic target - rather than the hundreds of thousands of the last 10 years, and is therefore good news for all our people, including immigrants and future immigrants.

"Immigration at the levels of the past decade is in no-one's interest."

Tory MP Peter Bottomley, a member of the cross-party campaign group, Balanced Migration, said the cap was needed.

"Clearly you need to have people you need. If for example, you have Canadian graduates with teaching diplomas, those are the sorts of people we need.

"For many others, we actually have 8% unemployment. It's not the employment thing that matters most to most people, the biggest thing is the effect on environment and on planning."

Tim Finch from the Institute of Public Policy Research, said the measures were just a stopgap and would have a detrimental effect on the higher education sector.

He added: "Do we really want to have restrictions on foreign students at a time when the higher education sector is facing funding cuts and is going to rely on the fees that those students bring in?"

The new government has also axed the national identity card scheme. It was brought in by Labour to tackle fraud, illegal immigration and identity theft but was often criticised for being too expensive and an infringement of civil liberties.

Ministers are also bringing forward to the autumn measures requiring many immigrants marrying UK citizens to prove they have a command of English.

The plans, which Labour had planned to introduce in July 2011, will apply to partners coming to the UK from areas outside the EU, such as South Asia.

What is your reaction to this story? Are you an immigrant from outside the EU? Do you run a business which employs migrant workers? Should the government put a cap on migration?

Office for Budget Responsibility recently predicted that curbs on immigration and costs of an ageing society will slow economy’s growth rate.

Evelie Padadac of Bison UK, which specialises in work and study related visas, said:

"A cap on non-EU migrant workers will do little to help employers who have no other choice but to bring in overseas staff to fill vacant positions.

"Bison UK has just reduced fees for Tier 2 processing and we are extremely busy helping employers become sponsors and worker obtain working visas."

See also:

Demographic shift ‘will cut UK growth’ according to ONS figures

Immigration cap ‘would damage hospitality sector’ say REC

If you need any immigration advice or help with Sponsorship or Work Permits, Visa or an appeal against a refusal please email:

info@immigrationmatters.co.uk or visit www.immigrationmatters.co.uk

Filipino domestic workers struggle for justice say ABS CBN

ABS-CBN's Niña Corpuz, the author of the article, "Filipino Domestic Workers: between justice and survival," won the 2010 edition of the journalistic prize for the best story on labour rights, awarded by the International Training Centre of the ILO (ITC-ILO), the training arm of the ILO.

The article was selected among stories written by professional journalists who attended the training courses on "Communicating Labour Rights," yearly organized by the ITC-ILO.

The courses introduce journalists and media professionals from all over the world, to international labour standards, with the aim of raising public awareness of their relevance to local labour and social issues.

The award ceremony was held in Turin, Italy, on Monday 21st June 2010 at the ITC-ILO.

Niña Corpuz is a broadcast journalist for the Philippine's biggest TV network, ABS-CBN Broadcasting Corporation. She has been a reporter for 9 years, covering labour, education, health and politics. She also anchors a television news program entitled "Balitang Europe" (News from Europe), which tackles the concerns of overseas Filipino workers in
Europe.

Niña also hosts a public service radio program, with Philippine Vice-President Noli de Castro, on ABS-CBN's AM station, DZMM, the No. 1 radio station in the Philippines. The program, "Para sa yo Bayan" (For the Country) discusses national issues affecting the Philippines, including the situation of overseas Filipino workers. She also anchors a radio talk show, "Magandang Gabi Doc" (Good Evening Doctor) which discusses health issues with the Philippines' top doctors. Niña is also a contributor for ABS-CBN's news website, www.abs-cbnews.com. Most recently, she joined the team of reporters who covered the Philippines' 1st nationwide automated Presidential elections. Source: ABS CBN News, Manila.

See also:

Overseas Filipino workers boost Philippine balance of payments

US Green cards face fee hikes

Complete USA Immigration and Naturalization Package

For more information on US Naturalization and immigration Click Here!

Ultimate Guide to Job Interview Answers

"How To Answer Any Question An Interviewer Could Possibly Throw At You! ... " Click Here!

If you need any immigration advice or help with Sponsorship or Work Permits, Visa or an appeal against a refusal please email:

info@immigrationmatters.co.uk or visit www.immigrationmatters.co.uk

Why 53% of people surveyed would move to Canada

More than half of people around the world say they would abandon their homelands and emigrate to Canada if they could.

Given the choice, 53 per cent of adults in the world's 24 leading economies said they would emigrate to Canada, according to an international survey commissioned by the Historica-Dominion Institute in partnership with the Munk School of Global Affairs and the Aurea Foundation.

It's a startling finding, one that is reinforced by respondents' overwhelmingly positive attitudes about Canada's welcoming and tolerant treatment of newcomers. The results bode well for Canada's efforts to attract highly educated immigrants as the global search for talent heats up in coming years.

“Canada is considered desirable for people all around the world. The shining city on the hill, as America was, and remains, for many people,” said Andrew Cohen, president of the Historica-Dominion Institute.

“Largely, it's because we welcome immigrants. We do not have anti-immigration parties in Canada. Almost every European country has one. We do not have a skinhead movement in Canada. So that speaks well of Canada and may point to our greatest success of the last 25 years, which is the manner in which we have continued to welcome immigrants.”

The tilt toward Canada is most pronounced in the emerging economies of the G20. More than three-quarters of those surveyed in China said they would prefer to live in Canada, followed by Mexico and India at close to 70 per cent. Slightly more than half of Britons, Italians and Russians said the same, while about four in 10 French and Germans would also choose Canada. Citizens of Japan and Sweden, followed by the United States and Australia, were the least interested in moving to Canada, with only one in five Swedes saying they would make the move.

Janice Stein, director of the Munk School at the University of Toronto, said the survey suggests Canada can thrive in the looming global talent wars.

“In terms of our economic future, our social future, our capacity to innovate, on all these dimensions that intelligent Canadians think about all the time, these are enormously encouraging data,” Prof. Stein said. “The developed world is getting old very quickly. … We are going to have to recruit globally as everybody else does.”

The reasons for Canada's relative attractiveness are clear: 86 per cent of respondents around the globe said Canada is a country where rights and freedoms are respected; 72 per cent said Canada is welcoming to immigrants; 79 per cent said Canadians are tolerant of people from different racial and cultural backgrounds; and 79 per cent said Canadians have one of the best qualities of life.

On most questions Canadians feel more strongly about their openness and tolerance than non-Canadians. Ninety-four per cent of Canadians say Canada is welcoming to immigrants, more than in any other country, but China and India, which have the largest diasporas in Canada, are not far behind.

“Of course we think we are [generous, open and tolerant,] Prof. Stein said. “Are we more vain than other publics? I doubt it.”

Canada's reputation in some areas is even stronger than Canadian vanity. Citizens of five countries, South Africa, Australia, France, Indonesia and South Korea are all more likely than Canadians to describe Canada as a country where rights and freedoms are respected.

Citizens of 10 countries, including China, South Africa, France and Russia, are more likely than Canadians to say Canada is tolerant of people from different racial and cultural backgrounds. Source: Joe Friesen, Globe and Mail, Canada.

For more information on how you can migrate to Canada - CLICK HERE

Complete USA Immigration and Naturalization Package

For more information on US Naturalization and immigration Click Here!

Ultimate Guide to Job Interview Answers

“How To Answer Any Question An Interviewer Could Possibly Throw At You! … “ Click Here!

Friday, June 25, 2010

American Immigration - what impact of increased processing fees?

The following article by analyzes the rising costs of US Immigration petitions and applications and how these increased fees may impact those who wish to bring a foreign loved one to the United States of America.

Recently enacted rules by the American State Department have resulted in increased fees for those applying for K-1 and K-3 visas, and their derivative counterparts, abroad. In the recent past, the application fee for K category visas was $131 per applicant. Under the recently promulgated rules, K visa applicants must pay 350 USD when applying for a K1, K2, K3, or K4 visa at a Consulate abroad. The apparent reason for the fee increase is due to the fact that the State Department seems to feel that more resources are necessary to effectively process certain non-immigrant visa applications. Many are of the opinion that increased fees will also be used to assist in the Department of State's ongoing efforts to uncover fraud in the American Immigration process.

Even though the Department of State and the Department of Homeland Security (the agency which has jurisdiction over the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service commonly referred to by the acronym USCIS) are two separate government agencies they both usually have a role in the American Immigration process. For instance, in K-1 fiance visa cases, USCIS is tasked with the adjudication of the initial K1 visa petition. After USCIS approval, the K-1 visa petition is sent to the National Visa Center (under the jurisdiction of the American State Department) where the case is forwarded to the Embassy or Consulate with proper jurisdiction. After the arrival of the K1 case file at an American Consulate overseas, the proposed beneficiary of the K-1 visa must submit a K-1 visa application and be subjected to a K-1 visa interview. Should the application receive approval, the K-1 visa holder must then travel to the United States within 180 days and request admission at the Customs and Border Protection Service (USCBP, also under the jurisdiction of the Department of Homeland Security) at an American port of entry.

Upon arrival in the United States and after marriage to the petitioner, the K-1 visa holder will have Ninety (90) days in which to apply for adjustment of status to lawful permanent residence.

The K1 visa process is complicated and rather time consuming. There are some who hope that an increase in petition and application fees will result in a faster and more efficient process. However, each American Immigration case is different and it is difficult to foresee all possibilities in each and every Immigration petition and/or application.

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services will raise fees an average 10% to help close a projected $200-million budget deficit. The cost of citizenship applications will not increase.

The cost of obtaining a green card, business visa and other US immigration benefits will increase an average 10% under a proposal announced Wednesday by federal immigration officials.

But in a move hailed by immigrant advocates, officials decided not to propose fee hikes for US citizenship applications, one of the largest and most politically popular categories of immigration benefits.

Citizenship fees were increased by nearly 70% to $675 in 2007, which immigrant advocates say contributed to a sharp drop in the number of citizenship applications over the last two years.

See also:

US Green cards face fee hikes

Complete USA Immigration and Naturalization Package

For more information on US Naturalization and immigration Click Here!

US Citizenship And Immigration | Ciudadania Americana E Inmigracion.

Immigration Is A Hot Market. Benefit From 100% Unique Content Based On Personal Events. This Is Not Legal Advice. | La Inmigracion Es Un Mercado Muy Cotizado. Aproveche El Unico Contenido 100% Basado En Eventos Personales. Esto No Es Un Consejo Legal.

For more information on US immigration Click Here!

Ultimate Guide to Job Interview Answers

"How To Answer Any Question An Interviewer Could Possibly Throw At You! ... " Click Here!

Wednesday, June 23, 2010

Canada takes on rogue immigration consultants

People seeking help to emigrate to Canada are set to be better protected after the Canadian government announced new legislation to deal with fraudulent immigration consultants.

Britons are among thousands exploited by the so-called crooked consultants, who are paid “extortionate amounts of money” by potential immigrants duped into believing they can guarantee them visas, for example, reduce the wait time for applications or claim to have connections in the Canadian immigration department who will expedite the process.

The national police force, the RCMP, and the Canada Border Services Agency are reportedly dealing with hundreds of current investigations into allegations against unscrupulous consultants across Canada. Around a quarter of a million people worldwide emigrate to Canada every year, while the number of immigrants settling from the UK has doubled in the past decade from approximately 4,500 in 1999 to 9,500 last year.

The Canadian government’s ‘Cracking Down on Crooked Consultants Act’ aims to close a loophole in the current legislation, which does not regulate any consultants’ involvement in the pre-application period. If passed, it would require all paid-for advice or representation be provided by an authorised immigration consultant, lawyer or notary only. It would also give the government power over the body governing immigration consultants “in order to ensure the integrity of the process”.

Jason Kenney, Canada’s minister of citizenship, immigration and multiculturalism, said at an earlier conference that, while most immigration consultants working in Canada were professional and ethical, “the unfortunate reality is that many consultants are acting dishonestly or even illegally to profit from people’s dream of coming here.” He cited one case of an exorbitant fee of $90,000 (around £60,000) paid to a crooked consultant by an immigrating family. “These prospective immigrants often find out too late that they’ve been deceived,” Kenney added

While the legislation of course covers Canada only, the minister will be also encouraging foreign governments to tackle the problem of crooked consultants dealing with immigrants to Canada. Jason Kenney is in London next week to talk about these and other immigration issues with Home Secretary Theresa May and Immigration Minister Damian Green as part of the Five Country Conference, comprising the UK, Canada, the US, Australia and New Zealand.

If anyone is defrauded by an immigration consultant in the UK, they are advised to file a complaint with the local police and inform the Canadian Embassy, said Kelli Fraser, media relations adviser for Citizenship and Immigration Canada.

She pointed out that immigration fraud happens, of course, around the world not just in Canada, but added that it threatens the integrity of Canada’s immigration system. “It also raises security concerns, wastes tax dollars, adds to the processing time for legitimate applications, and it is unfair to those who do follow the rules,” she said.

For more information on immigration protection and potentially choosing an immigration consultant, log on to www.cic.gc.ca/english/information/protection/index.asp

Canada is a growing country which needs skilled workers in a wide range of areas for instance from Care, Nursing and medical staff to catering and other trades. Unlike the UK, Canada is also open to immigrants who want to migrate there with a view to settle. Applicants must qualify under the Canadian points system.

UK based immigration consultants are regulated by the OISC, which has strict rules designed to protect migrants from exploitation. However, the rules do not extend to visa consultants operating abroad where the worst atrocities take place. Migrants coming to the UK have long been charged extortionate fees by unscrupulous unlicensed operators in their own country.

For more information on how you can migrate to Canada - CLICK HERE

See also:

American town bans renting property to illegal immigrants

US Green cards face fee hikes

The cost of obtaining a green card, business visa and other US immigration benefits will increase an average 10% under a proposal announced Wednesday by federal immigration officials.

Complete USA Immigration and Naturalization Package

For more information on US Naturalization and immigration Click Here!

Ultimate Guide to Job Interview Answers

“How To Answer Any Question An Interviewer Could Possibly Throw At You! … “ Click Here!

Tuesday, June 22, 2010

Weekly Immigration News Round up 20 June 2010 from www.immigrationmatters.co.uk

US Green cards face fee hikes

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services will raise fees an average 10% to help close a projected $200-million budget deficit. The cost of citizenship applications will not increase.

UK Border Agency foils sham marriage

A bogus groom has been jailed at Leeds Crown Court last week for 12 months after plotting to stage a sham marriage, the UK Border Agency said.

Justice Secretary defends government over Refugee and Migrant Justice collapse

Justice Secretary Ken Clarke has defended a decision not to prevent the collapse of the UK’s largest immigration law practice, the BBC reports.

Rapper Snoop Dogg granted UK Visa

Rapper Snoop Dogg Granted UK Visa by UK Border Agency and will play Glastonbury.

Revised forms and guidance for the Tier 4 Highly Trusted sponsor licence

The UK Border Agency has announced that revised versions of the application form and guidance for the Highly Trusted sponsors licence (under Tier 4 of the points-based system) have been published today.

Foreign Secretary Hague praises UK Filipino workers

Despite the United Kingdom’s strict migration policies and plans for a cap on non-EU migrants, new British Foreign Secretary William Hague welcomed the presence of the 250,000 UK based Filipinos and praised their “considerable” contribution to the country’s economy and health.

Overseas Filipino Workers investing more from remittances

The number of families of overseas Filipino workers (OFW) that set aside a portion of their monthly allotment as investments is growing, the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) said.

Threat from bogus students and visa fraud is low according to new evidence

As the US, UK and Australia compete for international students, fears of bogus applicants abusing visa systems persist, but recent research suggests fraud risk levels could be low, the Guardian reports.

Immigrants’ contribution to entrepreneurialism revealed

New study shows that restricting UK visas to key professions would stifle economic growth.

If you need any immigration advice or help with Sponsorship or Work Permits, Visa or an appeal against a refusal please email:

info@immigrationmatters.co.uk or visit www.immigrationmatters.co.uk

Complete USA Immigration and Naturalization Package

For more information on US Naturalization and immigration Click Here!

Early day motion by MP's in support of doomed Refugee Migrant Justice (RMJ) group

The JCWI has called for members to write to their MP's to ask for support for the Early Day Motion to save the RMJ.

The JCWI press release in full

Please send over a quick e mail to your MP to support the save RMJ campaign and ask them to out their name to Early Day Motion 191 tabled by Caroline Lucas MP. This appears below

Early Day Motion - EDM 191

REFUGEE AND MIGRANT JUSTICE CHARITY

09.06.2010

Lucas, Caroline

That this House notes that the legal advice charity Refugee and Migrant Justice (RMJ) is in danger of closing because it is facing a cash crisis because a large proportion of legal aid work is now paid upon completion, meaning payment can take anything up to two years; further notes that as a result the charity has a £1.8 million backlog of payments; further notes that senior legal and human rights experts, faith leaders including the Archbishop of Canterbury, Citizens Advice, Liberty and Mind all back the campaign to rescue the legal advice charity from the cash crisis that is not of their own making; is aware that RMJ is not asking for new money but simply prompt payment of legal aid by the Legal Services Commission, or failing that, interest-free loans by the Government to cover the gap; and calls for the legal aid payment system to be changed to ensure charities are paid promptly for their work.

Signatures( 32)

Status
Lucas, Caroline
Durkan, Mark
Edwards, Jonathan
George, Andrew
Meale, Alan
Hemming, John
Bottomley, Peter
Corbyn, Jeremy
Cunningham, Jim
Dobbin, Jim
Leech, John
Williams, Stephen
Russell, Bob
Mactaggart, Fiona
Cryer, John
Alexander, Heidi
Huppert, Julian
Reeves, Rachel
Mordaunt, Penny
Sanders, Adrian
Jackson, Glenda
Lazarowicz, Mark
Davidson, Ian
Hancock, Mike
Betts, Clive
Crockart, Mike
Blomfield, Paul
Wright, Simon
Illsley, Eric
Kaufman, Gerald
Abbott, Diane
McCarthy, Kerry
Yesterday the JCWI called on members and lawyers to stage a second demonstration in London.

See also:

JCWI call for demo against Refugee and Migrant Justice closure

Justice Secretary defends government over Refugee and Migrant Justice collapse

Weekly Immigration News Round up 20 June 2010

If you need any immigration advice or help with Sponsorship or Work Permits, Visa or an appeal against a refusal please email:

info@immigrationmatters.co.uk or visit www.immigrationmatters.co.uk

Complete USA Immigration and Naturalization Package

For more information on US Naturalization and immigration Click Here!